Disable records instead of deleting them
A disabled record stays in Jarl with its ID, TTL and comment but is left out of the zone; the zone file lists it as a comment. Web UI toggle, jarl record disable|enable, record.disable|enable operations and API endpoints. Database schema 5. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
5f04ab523b
commit
295c549479
29 files changed
+815
-60
No files matched your search
@@ -6,6 +6,23 @@ All notable changes to Jarl are documented here. The format follows
|
||||
|
||||
## [Unreleased]
|
||||
|
||||
### Added
|
||||
|
||||
- Disabled records: a record can be disabled instead of deleted. It stays
|
||||
in Jarl with its ID, TTL and comment but is left out of the zone (the
|
||||
zone file lists it as a comment), and enabling it puts it back exactly
|
||||
as it was. Web UI: a Disable/Enable button on each record, disabled
|
||||
records greyed out with a badge, a filter for them, and a count in the
|
||||
zone list. CLI: `jarl record disable|enable` (by ID or by name, type and
|
||||
data, `--ptr` for the PTR record, `--missing-ok`), `record list
|
||||
--disabled`, and `disable:`/`enable:` entries for `jarl apply -f`. API:
|
||||
`POST /records/{id}/disable|enable`, `POST
|
||||
/zones/{zone}/records/disable|enable`, a `disabled` field on records,
|
||||
`?disabled=` on record lists and `record.disable|enable` operations.
|
||||
Validation checks the zone as it is served: the last NS record can't be
|
||||
disabled, enabling a record is checked like adding it, and a disabled
|
||||
record that a CNAME now blocks gets a warning. Database schema 5.
|
||||
|
||||
### Changed
|
||||
|
||||
- Records table: names are no longer greyed out when they repeat the row
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user